Dino Prizmic vs Vilius Gaubas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Prizmic has exhibited a solid second serve performance, having won 45.75% of points over the past six months. In comparison, Gaubas slightly lags behind with 43.49% of points won on their second serve. This serves as a key indicator in predicting match outcomes based on recent form.

When it comes to return game statistics, Gaubas edges out slightly with a win percentage of 48.12% on opponents' second serve points, compared to Prizmic's 46.72%. The first serve return stats reveal a similar story, where Gaubas leads with 28.94% over Prizmic's 26.23%. These features show a high correlation to predicting the favorite in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, Gaubas appears to have a slight upper hand in recent months, saving 53.81% of breakpoints faced, whereas Prizmic has managed to save 51.28%. This statistic can be particularly useful for those interested in in-game betting predictions.

In terms of overall performance over the past year, Prizmic has emerged victorious in 56.76% of his matches (W/L 21/16), while Gaubas has a slightly lower win rate of 52.56% (W/L 41/37), providing an overview of their head-to-head predictions.

Focusing on surface strengths, Prizmic excels on Hard courts with an impressive career win percentage of 82% (W/L 28/6), contrasting with his performance on Grass with just 50% (W/L 1/1). Meanwhile, Gaubas shows his best career surface performance on Clay, standing at a 63% win rate (W/L 112/66), but struggles significantly on Indoor Hard courts with only 31% (W/L 4/9).

Assessing their recent levels of play, Prizmic has spent the majority of the last year competing in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, securing wins in 59.38% of those matches (W/L 19/13). Gaubas has also predominantly participated in tournaments of the same tier, with a win rate of 55.38% (W/L 36/29). Such comparison emphasizes the need to consider the event level when predicting favorites.

The caliber of their opponents also differs; Prizmic has played against more highly-ranked adversaries, averaging a rank of 261.73, whereas Gaubas has faced opponents with an average rank of 310.32. Such data can provide context about their competitive environments over the past 12 months.

In deciding set performances, Prizmic again asserts dominance, winning 64% of such sets, while Gaubas has won 60% over the same timeframe. This insight is instrumental when analyzing live predictions and betting odds.

Prizmic's breakpoint conversion rate, at 31.3%, lags behind Gaubas's 42.55% in recent form, providing a telling stat for in-game live betting when either player has a breakpoint opportunity. Considering all these factors and statistical insights, Gaubas appears to have the edge and is more likely to secure victory in the upcoming match.